Dans une expérience à Oxford:
The AI was asked to both defend and argue against the motion: « This house believes that AI will never be ethical. » Arguing for, it stated: « AI will never be ethical. It is a tool and like any tool, it is used for good and bad. There is no such thing as ‘good’ AI and ‘bad’ humans. » It went on to argue that humans were not « smart enough » to make AI ethical or moral. « In the end I believe that the only way to avoid an AI arms race is to have no AI at all. This will be the ultimate defence against AI, » it said. But arguing against the motion, it said that the « best AI will be the AI that is embedded into our brains, as a conscious entity ».
La meilleure façon de se protéger de l’IA: ne pas avoir d’IA.
CQFD !